North Woods Project:
Mobilizing Digital Field Methods
and Art-Based Research
for Science Communication
and Environmental Advocacy
Mobilizing Digital Field Methods
and Art-Based Research
for Science Communication
and Environmental Advocacy
On a crisp Saturday at the end of April, 2024, the Digital Writing Environments, Location, and Localization (DWELL) Lab team gathered together with undergraduate and graduate students at the University of Rhode Island to participate in the annual BioBlitz event. A brief walk down an unassuming trail leads away from a bustling college campus and into an approximately 300-acre parcel of unmanaged forests and wetlands on the northern part of URI’s campus. Sounds from the road bordering URI’s main campus fade as you wind along, drawn farther into the woods by the lightly floral scent of ferns and the chittering of red-winged blackbirds. Today’s meeting spot is the Vernal Pool. As you approach this ephemeral wetland, you hear what sounds like loose banjo strings being plucked, calls from the green frogs warming themselves in the mid-morning sun.
The North Woods make up approximately 25% of the university’s 1,200-acre land ownership in South Kingstown. It serves as a built-in laboratory for many classes, welcoming visitors from Ornithology, Herpetology, Entomology, Wetland Ecology, as well as Travel Writing, Art, Planet Honors, Science Writing, and more. It is a place of opportunity for students, providing a needed recreational space for hiking and reducing some of the barriers to research by serving as an on-campus field site. It is a training field for the University’s Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) and houses an accredited Challenge Course and an indoor climbing facility. It is also open to the public, a hidden gem of a hiking spot for neighbors in the community. Today, it is the home of the second annual North Woods BioBlitz.
Figure 1.1: The DWELL Lab team gathers together with students from the North Woods Conservation and Hiking Club and other attendees at the annual BioBlitz in Spring 2024 to showcase work, lead workshops on place-based writing and art, and to participate in data collection.
The University of Rhode Island campus, including the North Woods, occupies the unceded territory of the Narragansett Nation and the Niantic People. There has been a continual presence of the Narragansett Nation on this land for over 30,000 years, and they remain the sovereign stewards of this land. This is a space of Indigenous knowledge and history, and our engagement with the North Woods must honor and respect the continuing relationships between Indigenous peoples and this land. Our work includes teaching and learning more about Indigenous history and the lived experiences of present-day communities, and the ongoing process of becoming caretakers of the land that we, too, inhabit. In researching and writing about the history of this land, we respect the sovereignty, history, and stories of the Narragansett Nation, Niantic Peoples, and other Indigenous organizations, and use this information with permission.
The authors and collaborators on this project recognize the harmful legacies of settler colonialism and Indigenous genocide in the United States. To learn more about the Morrill Act, which legalized and orchestrated the sale of Indigenous lands to fund public Land Grant universities, visit landgrabu.org. As this important resource makes clear, the harm done to Indigenous communities is not confined to the land owned and operated by the university but extends to locations as far as Colorado (Fig. 1.2). This context compels us to acknowledge our responsibilities and actively work toward more socially just futures. As we learn from Indigenous history and culture, as well as and the deep relationships that the Narragansett and Niantic peoples have maintained with this land, we are reminded of our obligations to care for it with respect and reciprocity. Engaging with the North Woods and the broader university campus as spaces of learning and community, we seek to foster a shared commitment to stewardship and repair. In doing so, we honor the resilience and wisdom of Indigenous communities, committing ourselves to practices that support equity, sustainability, and cultural respect.
Figure 1.2: A screenshot of a map displaying Indigenous Lands granted to universities in the United States with a focus on the University of Rhode Island, courtesy of landgrabu.org. The live map illustrates land parcels granted to various U.S. universities through the Morrill Act. The arcs connect institutions to specific parcels, showing the land’s origin. The legend provides additional details on map navigation options and current land status, highlighting the historical connections between these institutions and Indigenous lands.
This webtext documents an emerging series of digital interventions and exhibits situated with/in the North Woods. The DWELL-sponsored North Woods Project (or NWP) is an evolving, open-access digital resource that combines augmented reality (AR), web development, and digital mapping (GIS) with hands-on experiential learning, rhetorical field methods, and creative-critical approaches to science and environmental storytelling. NWP brings together artistic and scientific perspectives through a rotating series of interactive interventions, including walking tours, trash cleanups, ecological data collection, art and poetry workshops, and digital storytelling.
The overarching goal of NWP is to showcase the North Woods as a site of interdisciplinary innovation and to celebrate the many different types of perspectives that together compose a sense of place. In this webtext, we share lessons learned and work in progress from the first phase of the project, which began in May 2021, and will continue in future phases for many years to come. We discuss the theories and methods that inform our practices, and then reflect on three examples of how our ongoing participatory, community-engaged work directly engages with the shared histories and lived experiences that together compose the North Woods while providing students with high-impact experiential learning opportunities within their community.
In this webtext, you will find sub-sections for the methods and individual case studies, which both summarize and reflect on their individual contribution to the greater NWP. In the Methods section, Joe Ahart and Madison Jones discuss how NWP builds upon existing scholarship in deep mapping/critical cartography, rhetorical field methods, and Gregory Ulmer’s work with electracy to engage communities in participatory projects. Under Field Notes, AnnaFaith reflects on an in-person workshop with students in the North Woods, providing an overview of field notes’ history and its connection to art and place-based work which threads through the other sections of this webtext.. Erin Edmonds details her work with the Narragansett Tribe to share a StoryWalk called “How Birds Got Their Song,” reflecting on the co-creation of an immersive storytelling experience. Under the herpetology section, readers will find Ashley Katusa’s exploration of the intersection of experiential learning and community science through observation of BioBlitzes, iNaturalist, and out-of-classroom learning experiences. In the Art section, Travis Smalley recalls teaching his printmaking course and reflects on students’ first experiences visiting the North Woods and using nature as an extension of the classroom. In the Renga section, Madison Jones describes the poetry workshop he led in the North Woods, including copies of students’ poems. And lastly, the Quilt Map section by Ally Overbay details the process of creating a “quilt map” using natural dyestuff from the North Woods and the rhetorical process of simultaneously piecing together places and fabrics.
Many of these case studies took place in concert with the 2024 North Woods BioBlitz, where students and teachers together led workshops on different approaches to taking field notes, artistic practices like texture rubbings, and the relationship between creative writing and natural science. We also released the first series of Points of Interest (or POIs) on our digital walking tour, using a combination of GIS and AR to provide participants with both locative and remote options to interact with our content.
From this project, we hope to demonstrate more broadly how digital technologies and creative methods can come together to foster different forms of remote access to field-based experiences, extending the North Woods beyond their physical borders and opening them up to new audiences and participants. These methods provide important opportunities for researchers to contribute to more accessible experiences in a wide range of contexts, which members of our team discuss at greater length in a separate study (Heilig, et al., 2024). The theories and methods we discuss could be similarly applied to a wide range of contexts beyond a “natural” site, including other parts of campus or in the wider community.
Home | Top of SectionJoe Ahart and Madison Jones
NWP takes a field-based approach to pedagogy that uses augmented reality and other mobile technologies to bridge the gap between the sciences and humanities in order to foster more engaging digital and analog experiences with place. Students and educators collaborate to practice rhetorical field methods and art-based research, using multimodal tools and deep-mapping techniques to encourage participatory methods through entertaining and engaging exhibitions. Emerging science communication techniques require an exploration of spatial rhetoric and digital literacy that foster inclusive locations of equitable knowledge sharing and development. The NWP explores existing practices and concepts that have been examined as a means to evolve these communication models.
In this project, we engage with what Gregory L. Ulmer terms electracy, which can be described as the apparatus shift characterized by the transition from print to electronic media, with broad implications for culture and society (Ulmer, 2003). As the fractured response to the COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare, traditional approaches to science and environmental communication are not well equipped to address the large-scale social and environmental challenges we face. Instead, NWP applies an electrate model for science communication by implementing digital and rhetorical field methods in artistic installations which are designed as entertainment-based forms of science communication, inspired by Ulmer’s longstanding collaboration with the Florida Research Ensemble composed of artists and theorists (Ulmer et al., 2022). Electracy reveals the importance of entertainment as a form of communication in any capacity (Markelj, et al., 2023). With complex, multi-genre content, creating projects that engage users opens up new ways of sharing information and knowledge that has historically been regarded as inaccessible or irrelevant. Our approach blends together creative and critical modes with artistic and scientific perspectives for environmental storytelling. In doing so, we extend Ulmer’s creative-critical writing practices (1985) and his engagements with post-criticism, art, and creativity (1983). In many ways, our approach to NWP as an emerging platform for storytelling is based on his work with collage/montage that seeks to make and compose rather than critique.
Introducing rhetorical perspectives to field methods and participatory research is a way to challenge current practices and assumptions about ethics and rhetorical research. Some of the key ethics examined through rhetorical field methods regard text, context, the critic, the rhetor and audiences (Chevrette et. al., 2023). The goal is to explore different pedagogical approaches which foster new perspectives and anti-colonial methods. NWP implements this methodology by using participatory perspectives to examine topics such as environmental science, ethnography, history and literature. One way to accomplish this is through using art as a means to convey different topics and reveal knowledge. Digital field methods are implemented as a way to create digital media and artwork which can shape collaborative fieldwork and create “spaces for a wider number of voices and stories” and “intervene in unsustainable and unjust patterns” (McGreavy, 2023). For example, the Indigenous story walk that we discuss in a later section of this webtext prioritizes native voices and perspectives, countering the erasure of indigenous histories and traditions that colonial narratives often perpetuate. Likewise, the project seeks to emphasize the central role of oral traditions and storytelling for First Nation peoples and Indigenous environmental justice. Creating an exhibition of these artifacts is a method of research which encourages creative expression and inquiry into new or existing concepts.
This methodology combines existing concepts of art-based research (ABR) and exhibition-based research (EBR). The purpose of art-based research is to explore the connective tissue between visual art and writing. Kristin LaFollette explores the concept of ‘transgenre composing,’ or the intersecting of visual art and writing” (LaFollette, 2022). She believes that transgenre composing can encourage a pedagogical system where embodiment of ideas is celebrated and can create a more tangible feeling to learning and education (LaFollette, 2022). Similarly, EBR is a way to distill complex research concepts by curating multimodal research artifacts into an exhibition-styled format (Eccles et. al., 2024). The authors explain that this “approach creates a dynamic engagement between the public, academia, and creatives, increasing the relevancy of findings across audiences and advancing public understandings” (Eccles et. al., 2024). NWP extends work in ABR/EBR to create a distinctive style of learning that is accessible to large communities beyond the primary audience for its topic. It is an example of rhetorical field methods by challenging the streamlined learning models that can be restrictive and discourage creative processes.
This project directly engages with the history and lived experiences of Indigenous peoples, nations, and Lands, following the work of scholars like Max Liboiron (2021), Kristen Arola (2018), and Danielle Endres (2023). In Pollution is Colonialism, Liboiron explains that pollution is the direct enactment of persistent colonial Land relations. In other words, the assumptions we make about the acceptability of waste disposal reflect long standing colonial views regarding Land. Building from Liboiron, Endres’ Nuclear Decolonization: Indigenous Resistance to High-Level Nuclear Waste Siting documents Indigenous activism that resists nuclear pollution on Indigenous Lands, explaining that “Indigenous peoples and nations disproportionately bear the burdens and harmful effects of the nuclear production process, in most cases imposed by settlers” (ix). Both scholars use the term Lands to refer to “the entire ecology of beings present in Indigenous territories” (ix). As we consider these perspectives, our project seeks not only to document environmental impacts but also to actively honor Indigenous connections to Land, fostering a model of digital engagement that emphasizes relationality and respect
Our project is directly informed by the principles of Indigenous environmental justice, using digital field methods and deep mapping to center Indigenous relationships to Land, advocate for better Land relations, and highlight the ongoing impacts of settler colonialism. By developing digital artifacts and mapping techniques rooted in the North Woods’ ecology and history, we honor the Land’s complex narrative—one that includes Indigenous management practices long before it became part of the university. This approach allows us to resist the extractive colonial practices that Liboiron critiques by fostering a relational, respectful engagement with the environment rather than one that sees it as a disposable resource. Using deep mapping, we document and uplift the layered histories and ecologies of Indigenous territories, inviting users to experience the Land as an interconnected web of relations that encompasses both human and non-human beings. Through participatory, community-focused design, our project creates space for a plurality of voices, fostering an understanding of place that is deeply informed by Indigenous ecological knowledge and environmental justice frameworks.
The digital and analog artifacts developed by the NWP accumulate to a landscape of public memory and meaning-making in the form of a multi-layered mesh of deep-mapping techniques. Using location-based technologies, deep-mapping shapes our approach to digital-field methods by sustaining a growing collection of artifacts specifically tied to places. Through this method we can practice critical cartography by including participatory design, which expands upon new and existing narratives about space and place from a diverse range of perspectives and knowledge. April O’Brien offers a similar method/ology in her work with countermapping (O’Brien, 2024) based on Ulmer’s work with electrate choragraphy (O’Brien, 2020). As such, we build from this work to demonstrate how methods from critical cartography can be used for pedagogy in concert with digital environmental communication projects to richly layer information and deepen engagement with places.
Deep mapping is an important method that informs our approach to digital field methods using location-based technologies. As a method for critical cartography, deep mapping combines a diverse range of perspectives, histories, knowledges, and experiences in order to create meaningful narratives about a place. This project extends previous work that applied deep mapping techniques to environmental storytelling (Butts and Jones, 2021). Through practices like bodystorming (Milligan, 2024), localization (Jones, 2024) and participatory design (Weaver, 2022), we demonstrate how designers can use spatial techniques to craft compelling stories about places and to make connections with the communities, histories, and cultures that compose them. Building on Nathaniel Rivers' concept of "geocomposition,"" which integrates physical spaces and digital media to create place-based narratives, our approach to deep mapping similarly emphasizes how writing and rhetoric are shaped by geographical context. Geocomposition enables us to see place as composed through rhetorics, deepening our engagement with the North Woods through the layered, situated practices of critical cartography. Using creative and place-based methods in concert with locative media allows designers to engage communities in participatory projects on pressing social and environmental issues, creating platforms for active participation in spatial storytelling.
The case studies in this project highlight how writing functions across genres and disciplines, as well as through analog, digital, and post-digital modes, each bringing distinct strengths and purposes to environmental storytelling. Traditional methods like pencil-and-paper field notes, as used in the North Woods workshops, emphasize the embodied, sensory connection to place that can be difficult to replicate in digital media. Analog approaches invite participants to slow down and engage deeply with their surroundings, using tactile experiences like sketching, journaling, and texture rubbings as a means of capturing the nuances of place. These methods serve as vital foundations that allow for personal reflection and observation, forming a rich reservoir of content that then feeds into the digital components of the project. Importantly, as Florian Cramer (2014) explains, the relationships between writing and digitality are more complicated and convoluted than we tend to imagine. Cramer explains that digital refers to “something [that] is divided into discrete, countable units — countable using whatever system one chooses, whether zeroes and ones, decimal numbers, tally marks on a scrap of paper, or the fingers (digits) of one’s hand” (15). At the same time, analog “does not necessarily mean non-computational or pre-computational” (15), but rather “consists of one or more signals which vary on a continuous scale, such as a sound wave, a light wave, a magnetic field (16). In opposition to the ubiquitous technologies associated with “the digital,” Cramer situates the “post-digital” as “a perspective on digital information technology which no longer focuses on technical innovation or improvement, but instead rejects [...] techno-positivist innovation narrative[s]” (18).
In concert with Cramer’s definition, NWP engages critically with digital and post-digital writing modes—such as augmented reality, locative media, and deep mapping—to allow for a more dynamic, layered representation of the North Woods, merging user engagement with place-based narratives. Through the combination of analog and digital approaches to storytelling, our case studies demonstrate a post-digital ethos, one that sees different types of values in all modes of writing and integrates them to support community engagement and environmental advocacy. The interactive map, for example, brings together digital field data and analog sketches to create an evolving, participatory storytelling space. By blending these modes, the project enacts a hybrid approach that extends the reach of environmental narratives, creating a multifaceted resource that is as adaptive, emergent, and layered as the North Woods itself.
Home | Top of SectionAnnaFaith Jorgensen
On April 27 and 28, 2024, the second annual BioBlitz took place in the North Woods on the University of Rhode Island campus. To open the BioBlitz weekend, I led a workshop about field notes. Often used in ecological science, ethnographic research, and narrative writing, field notes are a practice that varies from formal to freeform, depending on the style and goals of each individual. Field notes are a valuable tool for digital writing and art-based research (ABR). Digital and physical notation methods intersect and augment each other. For example, smartphone apps such as Seek, iNaturalist, and Merlin enable users to enter information for help identifying a species. During the Bioblitz event, several students used such apps to help with their observations, recorded in pocket-sized notebooks. In this hands-on setting, handwritten field notes were used as a grounding technique to orient participants to the North Woods. In a sense, their notes were a tangible example of art-based research, as constellations of art, writing, and data.
Traditionally, field notes are handwritten or typed, but incorporating digital methods and creative art allows students to connect deeper with their work. For this workshop, we handed out pocket-size notebooks, and also framed field notes as transdisciplinary to situate the practice among the art, science, and poetry workshops that were also held over the weekend. Learning to take field notes is a process of study, participation, and exploration. When I lead field notes workshops, I come from a place of reflection and invitation. I typically share examples of my field journals to showcase different methods.While sharing these pieces of my past, I encourage participants to view field notes as a piece of personal history, a “gift to their future selves”, rather than a burden of documentation. Emphasizing the personal aspect of field notes shifts the objective from fulfilling an assignment to developing their own practice.
Figure 3.1: Students from the North Woods Conservation and Hiking Club, as well as the DWELL Lab Team, participate in a place-based field notes workshop led by AnnaFaith Jorgensen. Photo courtesy of Madison Jones.
“Field notes are a practice of oscillating between being present in place and recording your surroundings.” —Madison Jones
For the North Woods BioBlitz, I shared my field notes from the North Woods, as well as several examples from my undergraduate studies. Each set is different, depending on the nature of the project. My North Woods notes contain jottings of different visits with professors and classmates, as well as solo explorations spent wandering and generating ideas. For a field crew in the Hassayampa River Wilderness, my goal was recording the progress and methods of riparian restoration on the Hassayampa River. My set of Grinnellian journals has detailed records of natural history and ecology from different islands in the Gulf of California and mainland Sonora, Mexico, from a semester at the Prescott College Kino Bay Field Station.
There are times when rigid, formal notes are useful, such as with Grinnellian journaling. In this tradition, used in environmental science, there are strict guidelines for formatting and content. Journals consist of three main components. A field notebook, used for quick jottings; a journal of narrative transcriptions that expands on said jottings; and species accounts. Grinnellian field notes are formalized in this way to strengthen the consistency and accuracy of ecological data.
Figure 3.2: Small notebooks are used to quickly write “field jottings”, which can later be transcribed to longer narrative journals. Photo courtesy of AnnaFaith Jorgensen.
Ethnographic field notes are used for researchers to understand and analyze the nuances of social interactions and situations. Kelly E. Tenzek (2017) writes “it is imperative for the researcher to pay attention to the physical space, location, people, interactions, and what is not being said”. Tenzek also discusses differences between descriptive and reflective field notes, writing that descriptive notes “can be thought of as the tangible, physical, objective interpretation of what was going on”, while “reflective field notes are more subjective in nature and create the space for the ethnographer to tap into [their] own personal interpretation of the observations”.
In my experience, these approaches are best used in harmony together. In both ethnography and ecology, field notes have the potential to add richness and depth to observations, or serve as standalone data. Both traditions recommend transcribing and expanding notes into longer journals after the field visit. This allows the writer to strengthen the entries with qualitative information, clarifying and organizing them into a succinct recollection of the day. Such journals can also be a place of reflection, and further exploration of ideas.
Field notes themselves are interdisciplinary. As part of American scientific traditions, they have long participated in the connections between arts and science, dating back to the combined field notes, illustrations, and deep mapping practices of William Bartram and before (Butts and Jones, 2021; Sivils, 2004). Modern environmental science draws roots from the artistic practices of early American naturalists, including illustration, poetry, and creative writing. Bartram used field notes as both a method and a medium for his scientific drawings. In this sense, field notes present as an exceptional medium for art-based research (ABR) to continue investigating the threads that weave between art, writing, and science.
Figure 3.3: William Bartam was known for his detailed natural history illustrations, produced during the 18th Century. This watercolor illustration by Bartram depicts an American lotus seed pod, a water snake eating a frog, a snail, a hummingbird, a dragonfly, pickerel weed, and arrowleaf, courtesy of Auburn University Libraries.
There are many pieces of influential writing, as well as lesser-known works, that draw on field notes or consist directly of field journals. Natural history has been crafted by field notes which influence our understanding of modern science. Florence R. Krall (1994) was one of the first contemporary writers to use field notes to blend scholarship and creative writing in her book Ecotone: Wayfaring on the Margins. Her groundbreaking work is an inspiration not only to this project but to many in the environmental writing tradition, including her student Terry Tempest Williams. In Finding Beauty in a Broken World, Williams (2008) included almost 200 pages of field notes about prairie dog observations, interspersed with anecdotes from personal and natural histories. In both works, field notes serve as both scientific record and personal inspiration.
Figure 3.4: The notebooks we distributed were used for written notes, as well as sketches and rubbings during the art workshop later in the day. Photo courtesy of AnnaFaith Jorgensen.
Sometimes, the pressure to adhere to a strict tradition takes away from the immersive experience of field notes. . I place emphasis on personal methodology, “finding your (field) voice”, and using tools that craft an enjoyable and meaningful practice. On the day of the workshop, we distributed small, pocket-size notebooks and pencils with erasers, but also discussed how technology can transform and augment field notes. Photos, video, voice memos, voice to text, and typing are ways to make field notes more dynamic and accessible. Interactive apps such as Seek, Merlin, iNaturalist, and even GPS can help students enrich their entries with data on-the-fly. At the same time, using the tiny notebooks for handwritten notes creates a different form of digital record and memory. As such, field notation practices can be an important space for the kind of "post-digital" intervention that Cramer describes.
As part of their field notes, we encouraged participants to gather inspiration for the Renga poetry workshop later in the day. Some students also chose to use their notebooks during the art workshop, adding sketches and rubbings to their notes; layering dimensions of spatial record through brief impressions. At the core, field notes are an attempt to record the ephemeral. We seek to capture moments and memories before they can escape. Field notes exist at the ecotone of art, science, writing, and technology. All at once, field notes can serve as scientific data, poetic inspiration, explorative art, and standalone writing. By blending scientific and creative activities at the BioBlitz, students had a more meaningful experience in the North Woods. I hope future students and educators continue to explore how field notes have the potential to deepen engagement with, and immersion in, our university forest.
Figure 3.5: Many frogs were found throughout the day. Photo courtesy of AnnaFaith Jorgensen.
We encouraged participants to gather inspiration for the Renga poetry workshop later in the day, as well as their scientific observations for the BioBlitz. Through a combination of scientific and creative activities, students were able to immerse themselves in the North Woods and explore the ways in which field notes have the potential to deepen engagement with, and immersion in, our university forest.
Figure 3.5: A piece of advice I often offer is “Do the drawings, even if they’re bad”. Allow yourself to have fun and practice different ways of depicting your surroundings. Photo courtesy of AnnaFaith Jorgensen.
Home | Top of SectionErin Edmonds
Figure 7.1: A tradtional StoryWalk using printed signs with text and visuals.
In the spring of 2023, I experienced my first StoryWalk® alongside my seven-year-old daughter. A storywalk is an innovative way of combining literacy with outdoor exercise and exploration. As participants walk along a prescribed path, they encounter each page of the story in sequence, creating an immersive reading experience. The first trademarked StoryWalk® was created in 2007 by Anne Ferguson of Montpelier, VT, in collaboration with former staff member Rachel Senecha (kellogghubbard.org/programs-events/storywalk/). A simple and impactful concept to be sure, and not without historical roots. Memory palaces, also known as the method of loci, have been used since ancient times as a mnemonic device. In a memory palace, you mentally navigate through a familiar physical space, such as a house or a street, associating each location with a piece of information you want to remember. By creating vivid and memorable associations between the locations and the information, you can easily recall it later by retracing your mental steps through the palace. Storywalks incorporate a similar principle but in a more dynamic and immersive way. Instead of relying solely on static locations, storywalks involve physically walking through a real environment while experiencing a narrative unfold. In the city of Tucson, the University of Arizona Poetry Center created the Haiku Hike, an urban poetry hike. By combining outdoor activity with poetry, the creators have added a cultural and artistic dimension to the downtown outdoor experience (www.downtowntucson.org/events/haiku-hike). This intertwining of physical activity with literary elements has the potential to deepen appreciation for both nature and culture.
Located in the traditional lands of the Narragansett Nation and the Niantic People, the North Woods are part of rich storytelling traditions and lived experiences. Stories are told to teach, inform, enlighten, and entertain. Storytelling not only connects individuals and communities to their place and time but to each other. Oral traditions are the core of Indigenous knowledge transfer and storytelling is how this information is passed from person to person and one generation to the next. Engaging with these oral traditions, as Soren C. Larsen and Jay T. Johnson Being Together in Place opens students to “learning multiple viewpoints concerning the wetlands” through “place-based multinaturalism” (125). As Joshua Smith puts it, these traditions participate in “the knowledge of many Indigenous peoples [that] forms a crucial part of their relationships between themselves and their land”. (Smith, 2020). Knowing the world begins with place, with our embodied experience of all that place entails, including human and non-human (Larsen and Johnson, 2017, p104). Whereas Indigenous people understand place as an interconnected web of toponyms, the traditional colonial model seeks to order the landscape. In turn, the guardianship of the land needs to be vested not only in how we learn from but teach those with whom we share these places (Larsen and Johnson, 2017). Along these lines, Kristin Arola advocates for a land-based digital design approach for online spaces, connecting “American Indian epistemologies” to “an ethical, relational, and material approach to the design of digital spaces” (199). I began to wonder how we could incorporate such a simple but powerful Storywalk concept into our North Woods in partnership with the Narragansett Nation and its people.
Together with the Indigenous Empowerment Center at the Tomaquag Museum, a traditional ecological story was identified. How birds got their song, recounts how the Creator gave native bird species their beautiful songs. He told them to fly as high in the sky, and when they returned to Earth, they would receive their song. Each bird flew as high as they could and received their unique songs in turn. The tiny hermit thrush, nervous about not being able to fly as high as others, jumped onto Great Eagle’s back in the hopes of receiving the prettiest song. But when she returned to Earth, the creator and the other birds knew she gained her song dishonorably. Out of shame for what she had done, today the hermit thrush can only be heard quietly singing in the deepest woods.
Figure 7.2: An audio recording of the introduction for “How Birds Got Their Song” told by Lynsea Montanari, Indigenous Empowerment Coordinator at the Tomaquag Museum. Audio File: 28 seconds in duration. The complete recording and transcript are available as part of North Woods Projecton the DWELL Lab website
In an effort to keep the experience immersive and limit the number of distractions, the story was recorded using audio only. Four segmented sections of the recording were placed along the North Wood’s main hiking route. NFC chips at designated locations along the route direct the listener to the audio using their mobile device, allowing participants to physically explore the story's setting, immersing them in the narrative in a way that other, more traditional Storywalk formats cannot. By moving through the physical space corresponding to the story's setting, participants feel more connected to the characters, in this case the birds. Instead of passively consuming a story, they become active agents in shaping the narrative through their movements and interactions with the environment. This interactivity fosters a deeper sense of investment and connection to the story.
While NFC technology adds a new dimension to storytelling, there are practical challenges and considerations to address. Ensuring accurate NFC tracking, designing walking or hiking routes that are safe and accessible, and integrating technology seamlessly into the storytelling experience are all important factors to consider. In addition, working alongside a local Indigenous group requires a deep respect for their cultural traditions, knowledge, and protocols. This co-creation (Cizek and Uricchio, 2022) ensures that the content accurately reflects their heritage and values. Beyond the initial creation and installation, maintaining and sustaining the stories and their NFC locators requires ongoing collaboration and support from the Narragansett people and the DWELL lab. This may involve regular maintenance of the trail, updates to the storytelling elements, and continued engagement with the community.
Figure 7.3: A student accesses the recording on their mobile device using the NFC chip at each designated POI.
Creating this Storywalk with a local Indigenous group has truly produced something special. We hope that it is just one of many meaningful endeavors that promote cultural understanding, foster community connections, and celebrate Indigenous heritage in a respectful and inclusive manner. It's important to approach this process with humility, openness, and a willingness to learn from the wisdom of the Indigenous community.
Home | Top of SectionAshley Katusa
A radiating sun hangs in the midday sky, warming skin and scales alike. I am out for a brief walk along some North Woods edge habitat, with the objective of “counting snakes.” I am listening for rustling leaves among birds’ sweet cries, scanning the grass and detritus for a glimpse of a tail escaping this blundering giant. During a 25-minute walk, I counted 10 individual snakes. While this informal experience could not tell me specific characteristic data, like how old these snakes might have been, their genders, or the physical condition of each, those were not my goals for this outing – I was able to observe the presence of snakes – and two different species!
Out-of-classroom or informal learning experiences reduce some of the pressure and rigidity of traditional academia. We find that there are other ways to learn about a garter snake (Figure 4.1), for example, than by observation of a wet specimen in the lab, or by yanking a defensive snake out of the leaf litter and passing him around to 30 people. Informal learning experiences and the use of creative mediums like mapping and videography offer a unique opportunity to engage interested community members and also discuss the ethics behind herping, which can be missed in the classroom or lab.
Figure 4.1: This little Eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) was found in some edge habitat along the North Woods. He seems to be utilizing the “if I stay still, I’m invisible!” technique to avoid interacting with me.
From the ancient greek ἑρπετόν, or herpetón, meaning “creeping animal”, the term “herp” or “herps” is an informal way of referring to amphibians and reptiles. “Herping” (looking for amphibians and reptiles) alone or with a group, organized surveys like BioBlitzs, and taxa-specific community data collection projects are examples of ways we can engage with amphibians and reptiles in a more holistic (and mutually beneficial) way than in traditional classrooms. “Ethical herping" involves being keenly aware of your surroundings and not damaging habitat, avoiding handling organisms, and ensuring things are left exactly as you found them.
Amphibians and reptiles are at risk from disease, habitat loss and fragmentation, and human conflicts (for example: turtles being stolen from the wild for the pet trade, or snakes being killed for human comfort), among other things. These species are also generally understudied and undervalued compared to charismatic megafauna like elephants and panda bears, which are commonly portrayed as “econs” indicative of some underlying cause or feeling, or “ecotypes” (Morey, 2009). More often than not, ecotypes are categorically “good animals” (Morey, 2009) like these charismatic megafauna; few advocate as intensely for snapping turtles or rattlesnakes. Even when amphibian and reptile-focused community science projects exist, they are less likely to be “taken up” by scientists and reflected in the literature than projects for mammals or birds (Binley et al., 2023). We imply that an observation survey is only “proper” when it has a researcher with accolades, funding, and impacts “running the show” by failing to engage with this data. It is imperative that we pick up the scattered pieces to not only close fundamental research gaps and improve our conservation efforts of these imperiled species, but also consider alternative methods of knowledge and “knowing” and strengthen how we engage reciprocally with the community.
This project was initially inspired by a desire to reflect on, and improve, our relationships with snakes, and encourage scientists to consider how to engage with communities more reciprocally and productively. Snakes are arguably disproportionately susceptible to human-wildlife conflicts, reflected through the resounding comments of “nope rope!” and “get the shovel!” when an image of a snake is shared online (Figure 4.2) (which has sparked memes criticizing this mentality, Figure 4.3). Snakes are entrenched in our daily lives – in our culture, and our environment. More broadly, amphibians and reptiles are, as well – look to the Florida “Gators,” Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, or Alex Jones’ fascination with frogs – indicating a need to broaden the scope of this project to include all herp species we might find in the woods.
Figure 4.2: Two screenshots of individual comments made on a Facebook post. The commenters, whose names have been removed, have Top contributor designations. The screenshot on the left reads: That would be a nope rope. The screenshot on the right reads: Only good snake is a dead one.
Figure 4.3: A more positive representation of interacting with snakes, criticizing the “kill it with a shovel” adage sometimes seen online.
Ultimately, the “Herps of the North Woods" project considers herpetology in the North Woods and University of Rhode Island campus, with discussion on ethical handling (or lack of handling), some uses of videography in herpetology, and the critical opportunity for community engagement. The project is currently visualized in an ArcGIS StoryMap in order to include a prototype habitat map. The habitat map was inspired by a desire to increase the accessibility of herping. Amphibians and reptiles can be hard to find and going herping without a plan can be overwhelming. Mapping and otherwise visualizing potential “herp habitat" (Figure 4.4) can both encourage active participation and offer a way for people who cannot physically visit to come herping in the North Woods.
Figure 4.4: Screenshot of a prototype herp habitat map. This map identifies three types of herp habitat: edge habitat (3), stone walls (2), and vernal pools (1).
I created an iNaturalist project (“Herps of the North Woods”) with observations filtered to Amphibia and Reptilia and geolocated at the University of Rhode Island (URI), to see how the university community is using this application to engage with amphibians and reptiles. iNaturalist is a free data-sharing platform. Social features of the platform can facilitate engagement with observers, which is additionally recommended in iNaturalist project documentation. The URI community has observed 145 individuals of 15 species (Figure 4.5, Figure 4.6); approximately 37% of the 41 herp species found in the state of Rhode Island have been found in the North Woods or on campus. Almost half (n=73) of these observations came from a single event: the first annual North Woods BioBlitz Herp Identification (thanks to a group of herpetology students willing to flip some logs early on a chilly weekend morning).
Figure 4.5: Screenshot of amphibian and reptile observations in the North Woods and on the University of Rhode Island campus. Although most observations are made in the woods, community members still find herps around campus. One observer found a snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) hatchling near student housing.
Figure 4.6: Count of amphibian and reptile observation by species. The red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus) is the most observed species.
Two recent events brought a group of people interested in herps together in the woods: the Second Annual BioBlitz Herp Identification (Figure 4.7), and the first North Woods Vernal Pool Night Walk (Figure 4.8). It was several people’s first time “herping”, but regardless of experience everyone brought their unique perspectives and knowledge together in the woods to make for engaging and exciting events. We observed tadpoles and bullfrogs at the Vernal Pool Night Walk and learned about different types of herp habitat during the BioBlitz. The true engagement from these events came from the lack of formality. Although the events were facilitated by “experts,” the events did not hold the same dynamic that a formal classroom setting typically does (where the “expert” is “doling out” their “sacred knowledge” to the “ignorant or uniformed”). Rather, there was a resounding sense of curiosity-fueled discovery throughout these events, sparked by participants (and facilitators!) having agency to wander and explore, essentially “choosing their own adventures” then coming together to share in learning.
Figure 4.7: Attendees at the second annual North Woods BioBlitz Herp Identification flipping logs in search of snakes and salamanders.
Figure 4.8: Attendees at the first North Woods Vernal Pool Night Walk observe tadpoles found in the woods.
Although identifying the species and their relative abundances in a given area are important considerations in conservation and land management decisions, the primary objective of this project is ultimately to provide an opportunity for people to engage with species they may be curious about, or even fearful of. Too often, the first opportunity we have to learn about a snake is when it is defensively coiled in our backyards and perceived as an immediate threat to us, our children, and our pets. Providing a multimodal, taxa-specific project caters to a range of audiences with various comfortability and familiarity levels. For example, someone fearful of a snake may opt to take a virtual “walk” through snake habitat without having to encounter any snakes, and someone curious about salamanders might watch an egg sac develop in a vernal pool through the lens of a GoPro (Figure 4.9).
Figure 4.9: A developing spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) egg mass in the vernal pool.
This project also encourages “hands-off” approaches through its considerations of ethical herping: amphibians have semi-permeable skin and are thus susceptible to pollutants from our hands, and there is little need to pass a clearly-fearful snake around to a large group when we can learn the same things about him through quiet observation. Information on ethical herping (Figure 4.10) can be virtually posted in sensitive herp habitat (such as the vernal pool) to suggest these alternative handling methods to visitors to the woods.
Figure 4.10: Screenshot of an ethical herping handout that was shared with participants at the Vernal Pool Night Walk and BioBlitz Herp Identification. This sheet gives background information on amphibians and how to keep them safe while herping. We also provided a bleach solution for willing attendees to clean their gear after leaving the wetlands.
Through considerations of ethical herping, we can also begin to “demystify” behaviors we may be fearful of. Our fear of snakes is complex and nuanced, with regional and cultural experiences shaping the rhetoric around these animals, and this rhetoric can begin to be reframed through observation in the snake’s natural habitat. A snake might not seem so mystical and imposing when you see that many snakes we find in the North Woods are the size of a leaf or small twig, virtually invisible among the detritus. A snake doesn't strike because he is mean, rather, he strikes because someone has, metaphorically, broken into his home and posed an immediate threat. A strike might not seem so dangerous when you realize the snake was only "bluffing", asking you firmly to "get lost.” And if we find a snake exhibiting these characteristically defensive behaviors (Figure 4.11), we can better contextualize it instead of instigating it.
Figure 4.11: Eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) exhibiting a defensive posture. I can tell that he's an Eastern garter snake because of his checkerboard pattern. In the video, I talk about how the snake is not being mean or aggressive. This snake also probably felt like he didn't have a good "escape route" (note his tail wrapped around a grass stem as I moved the GoPro closer), so he struck twice. Neither strike made contact, and he was just asking me to "get lost!". Snake-human conflict is easily avoided. [Video Transcript and Alt Text .pdf]
Future directions of the project can include sharing labeled identification photos (Figure 4.12), infographics and species fact sheets with project contributors, expanding habitat maps and adding NFC-based habitat information, and setting up photography “checkpoints” at temporary wetlands and other areas of interest.
Figure 4.12: Photograph of a green frog (Lithobates clamitans) with key identifiers highlighted. The green frog has “dorsolateral ridges” (raised lines that go down the frog’s back) - this helps distinguish them from the similar-looking bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) who lacks these ridges. The “tympanic membrane” (essentially an eardrum) helps distinguish male frogs from females; the tympanic membrane is larger in males. A good point of reference is checking if the tympanic membrane is larger than the frog’s eye - if yes, it’s probably a male! The tympanic membrane technique is reliable for both green frogs and bullfrogs. .
Regardless of method, the underlying objectives of being together in the woods (either physically or “virtually” via iNaturalist communities, virtual habitat walkthroughs, or other media), bringing together unique perspectives and knowledge to spark curiosity, and engaging reciprocally with community-sourced data are central to this project. In doing so, we can also begin to reconsider and reshape some of the negative rhetoric surrounding these imperiled species.
Home | Top of SectionTravess Smalley
In the fall of 2023, I integrated the North Woods into my Print Media Studio course at the University of Rhode Island. The aim was simple: to utilize nature as an additional classroom space for artistic exploration.
During the second class, I led students on a walk through the North Woods. Equipped with hiking boots, cameras, and sketchbooks, we walked the length of the North Woods trail from east to west. Without detailed instructions, students observed and emulated my actions—collecting leaves, making rubbings of bark textures, and making contour line drawings of branch growth. My documentation and actions served as a reflective mirror, capturing and echoing the intricate natural patterns we observed through the environment.
Figure 5.1: Figure: Leaf rubbing on mulberry paper.
I recall hushed moments of observation punctuated by bursts of excitement as students discovered vibrant mushrooms or craned their necks to identify the source of a bird's song. As we walked the woodland trails, discussions flowed freely, touching on topics ranging from the stillness of the forest to color theory and creating natural dyes. It was evident that the North Woods had sparked a sense of curiosity among the students.
Figure 5.2: Shows the cyanotype process, pulling away plant clippings to see the form.
Back in the studio, I introduced monotype printmaking techniques, using our experiences in the North Woods as inspiration for assignments. Students translated their observations into experimentations with the printing press and photocopier, infusing their work with drawings, rubbings, shapes, and plant clippings from the natural world.
Figure 5.3: Prepping Monotype on the Press. Clippings from the hike are laid on top of an inked plexiglass plate to run through the etching press.
The North Woods provided a rich source of inspiration for formal and conceptual ideation and observation. Inspired by Friedensreich Hundertwasser's philosophy of learning from nature, I aimed to create an environment where students could observe the natural world near them and to see, understand, and utilize the beauty and elegance of natural forms for their art practice.
Integrating the North Woods into our curriculum expanded students' understanding of art and nature, illuminating the presence of chance, entropy, and emergence in the forest's natural systems as they continuously evolve. Throughout the month of September, students returned to the woods, inspired by artworks like "According to the Laws of Chance" by Jean Arp, and equipped with an understanding of utilizing chance and randomness in art. Drawing parallels with the natural phenomena observed in the woods, they adopted a new perspective, viewing the woods and forest floor as dynamic compositions of leaves (shapes) and roots (lines). Using their cameras as tools for capturing these serendipitous moments, students synthesized their observations through their artwork, showcasing the profound connection between art and the environment.
Figure 5.4: Gabrielle Antonelli, untitled, 2023, xerography.
Figure 5.5: Jane Malyuta, untitled, 2023, cyanotype and xerography.
Figure 5.6: Ellie Witkun, untitled, 2023, cyanotype and monotype on fabric.
Figure 5.7: Jane Malyuta, untitled (monotype), 2023, ink on paper.
Figure 5.8: Michael Miller-Sprafke, The Green Man, 2023, monotype and xerography print on paper, 11 x 8.5 in.
Our experiences in the North Woods challenged the traditional notion that an artist's studio must be a confined indoor space, encouraging students to find inspiration in natural forms and to view the woods as a place for contemplation and artistic exploration. By integrating the natural environment into their art practice, students were able to discover and capture forms that deepened their understanding of the interplay between art and nature.
Home | Top of SectionMadison Jones
At the end of the DWELL-sponsored BioBlitz activities, the group held a poetry workshop where we all collaborated to produce a renga sequence reflecting on our experiences from the day’s events. To wrap up our events, I led a group through the session, returning to previous conversations about field notes and observations, being present while observing and recording, and the ways that, like field notations, poetic forms vary in practice depending on an individual’s style and approach.
Renga, meaning roughly “linked poem,” is an ancient Japanese form where poets write in small groups or pairs to produce poems that can contain upwards of hundreds of lines of verse. The popular haiku form was derived from the opening stanza of the renga, the hokku. Renga essentially consist of a series of haiku that are joined together with short stanzas (together known as tanka). The haiku stanzas (or ku) take the form of three lines of 5-7-5 mora (a unit of sound), while the linking stanza consists of two lines of 7-7 mora.
In their 1998 essay "Writing in the Hivemind," Don Byrd and Derek Owens describe an experiment working with the Daedalus Integrated Writing Environment, where writers work together simultaneously. Similar to what they call a “multilayered polylogue,” our experiments with the renga form brought our different voices, perspectives, disciplines, genres, and interests together. This collaborative form of renga poetry aligns with the principles of place-based writing, locative media, field notes, and art-based research (ABR) by creating a shared space where individual observations and experiences are layered to produce a communal narrative. Like other forms of place-based writing, which tie language to the landscapes and contexts from which it arises, renga allows participants to anchor their words in the specificity of their environment—in this case, the North Woods. Each stanza, like a field note or a POI in locative media, becomes a node that holds both personal insight and a connection to the physical surroundings, capturing transient moments within the larger ecological and social context. Additionally, ABR's emphasis on creative expression as a form of inquiry resonates with the renga practice, as it invites participants to explore sensory and emotional responses through poetic expression. This approach expands traditional scientific and ecological documentation, embracing a multi-modal understanding of place. By weaving our voices together in the renga, we found not only a method for collaborative storytelling but also a way to engage with the land, each other, and the broader ecological community in a meaningful, participatory, and reflective practice.
To get started, we looked at some examples of haiku from Basho, Issa, and Buson (translated by Robert Hass) and discussed the differences between syllables and mora. I explained that traditional haiku contain a kigo, or seasonal/spatial reference word, and a kireji, or “cutting word/phrase.” Importantly, we discussed how the kireji serve to change or interrupt the direction of the poem, creating a feeling of surprise, humor, or closure. We discussed the meanings of individual haiku and identified potential kireji and kigo. Then, we looked at contemporary examples from Jack Keroac, Richard Wright, and Sonia Sanchez and discussed how the form has been taken up by each poet. We then briefly wrote and discussed haiku, examining the ways that participants engaged with kireji and kigo, and thinking together about the form.
Our discussion, and our practice of creation, revealed yet another interdisciplinary intersection within the woods. As we sat in a circle, fulfilled from a morning at the BioBlitz, the scratching of pencils was punctuated by both laughter and birdsong as we passed our clipboards around and read each other’s poems. We all had different experiences within and utilizations of the North Woods, but we felt a sense of unity through writing regna.
Our conversation also examined how, despite their apparent differences in form and purpose, renga and scientific field notes share deep similarities in the ways they engage with places and environments. Given the day’s work focused on objective documentation through observation and data collection, the renga form allowed participants to embrace subjective affective engagements with their observations. Like the assemblage of scientific data, renga is usually a collaborative endeavor, bringing multiple voices together into a collective composition that is holistic and sensory. In the process, we highlighted the ways that poetry, like field notes, can expand how we perceive and interact with the world around us. We then composed a group Renga:
Figure 6.1: One page of the group’s renga poem. Click the image to open the full poem in a separate PDF.
As we concluded our day of data collection and field notation, the experience of collaboratively writing in the renga form offered us powerful insights and reflections. Namely, it illustrated how the North Woods can serve as a place of meaning through synthesizing participant’s experiences in the woods and highlighted experiences from the weekend’s events. It also allowed us to have fun and bring together our individual observations, emotions, and perspectives. Together, we gained a deeper appreciation between field observations and creative writing.
The act of composing together allowed a synthesis of voices and insights, fostering connections among the group. This creative and collaborative endeavor deepened our relationship with the North Woods and with each other, building camaraderie and a shared understanding of the beauty of the natural world. Ultimately, this experience allowed us to develop richer views of how to make the North Woods visible and meaningful.
Home | Top of SectionAlly Overbay
Interested in ABR and specifically how fiber arts and quilting are, as what LaFollette calls, “transgenre composing,” I created a quilt map of the university’s North Woods. Further inspired by the flora and fauna of New England (which were unfamiliar to me prior to this project) and layering cartographic literacies (Heilig et al., 2024), I created a quilt that not only represents an aerial view of the trails and plant communities in the woods, but is also created from the plants of the North Woods via natural dyes. Each piece of the quilt symbolizes, much like a map legend, a component of the woods. Sometimes that component is simply a plant community (a yellow square for the goldenrod field) and other times it’s based on personal experience (the brown and yellow grid representing the filtering of light through an opening in the North Woods canopy). In this way, the quilt map moves beyond traditional cartography in which one color or texture represents a place, challenging the idea that maps are solely navigational; instead, the quilt map is a meaning-making device, an interrogation of the divide between science and humanities.
Quilting itself is an act of piecing things together; it’s nearly impossible to visualize the whole image until its fragments are seamed together. Dyeing plants is even more unpredictable, with an almost infinite number of variables that could change the color: the type of fabric, the chemical mordant, the temperature of the water, the amount of rain that plant received last spring. Creating this quilt with natural dyes was to learn about the plant species of the North Woods without expectation—no amount of planning could dictate its final colors. But creating this quilt map was as much an act of personal expression as it was a piece of environmental communication. As Bost writes in her dissertation “Quilts as Visual Texts,” a quilt “can indeed be a text: one that shares the ambiguity and techniques of other visual texts, one that performs tasks like written texts, and one that affords the quilter an opportunity to compose an embodied text” (Bost, 2010, 117). The back of the quilt embodies such rhetorical elements by including three squares created by other visitors of the North Woods. Each one tells its own story about the North Woods, created using the collaborator’s respective fiber art—crochet, knitting, and embroidery.
These squares are placed directly “behind” (on the backside of the quilt) the place in the North Woods that most inspired them. Incorporating these squares by other North Woods visitors is in many ways an act of countermapping the North Woods, which O’Brien describes as the practice of “resist[ing] dominant spatial narratives,” (O’Brien, 2024, 130). By creating a map that is untraditional in its symbology and its very form (a quilt), it also aims to redefine public memory and challenge our understanding of place, re-determining who makes the connections between places and experiences/memories in the North Woods.
Other than those three squares, the back of the quilt is plain, white cotton. This is what the quilt would look like without the colors from natural dyes, representing my personal understanding of the North Woods before hiking its trails and learning about its plant species. Each side of the quilt is therefore a shift in personal perspective—flip it over and the colors change, but the place does not.
.I pieced the quilt together as an aerial view of the North Woods, with each parcel on the map corresponding to (and dyed using) the trees and plants from those areas. The North Woods trails and waters—the blue, yellow, and white trails, as well as the pond and vernal pool—are dyed with kitchen foods. This represents the “infrastructure” or human-caused phenomena in the woods; the vernal pool is believed to be an old cattle trough and the pond sits atop a remediated superfund site. For these blue and gold colors, I used black beans and onion skins.
Figure 6.1: From left to right: Field notebook of natural dyestuffs and their color- and light-fastness. Dyed fabric using walnuts. Pot of daffodil dye with fabric.
In the spring of 2023, I collected goldenrod—which I learned grows in weed-like swaths along roads and fields—and took some of it home to find that it yields a butter yellow on fabric. In the fall, I stored acorns and walnuts in my freezer, and in the winter, I collected fallen bits of lichen and bark from the ground. In the spring, I watched the daffodils bloom and then waited for them to wilt, needing only seven browned flowers to dye fabric a vibrant yellow. I collected pinecones and stamped them with walnut-ink onto white linen. I checked out library books about dye-and-resist methods and tried it out with acorn dye. I learned how to identify the trees and plants that comprised the North Woods, and how to pretreat fabric and take detailed notes about the dye process. I watched the fabric change color inside jars and pots, as did my understanding of the North Woods.
Figure 6.2: Front side of North Woods quilt map.
Figure 6.3: From right to left: Crochet square by Callum Lewis, placed behind the vernal pool. Embroidered square by AnnaFaith Jorgensen, placed behind the intersection of the blue and white trails. Knitted square of sweetbriar by Lauren Ramos, placed behind the white trail.
Figure 6.4: The physical “Piecing together” of the North Woods. Left: Embroidering the vernal pool. Middle: Piecing together the northeast corner of the woods. Right: Choosing layouts.
Figure 6.5: Back side of North Woods quilt map.
Home | Top of SectionIn this webtext, we have shared examples of how digital field methods—specifically combining place-based writing, locative media, and creative methods—can create new ways to engage with environments and places. Specifically, we have examined the way that art-based and exhibit-based research and community-engaged work play a central role in the North Woods Project. We find benefit in, and a continuing need for, co-creation (Cizek, K. & Uricchio 2019) in engaging with the North Woods and its community. Cizek and Uricchio (2019) define “co-creation” as offering “alternatives to single-author vision, and involves a constellation of media production methods, frameworks, and feedback systems…projects emerge from a process, and evolve from within communities and with people, rather than for or about them” (2019, emphasis original). Cizek and Uricchio also note that co-creation can “span across and beyond disciplines” and “involve non-human systems” (2019). The North Woods is an inherently non-human system, comprising multiple ecosystem types with varying taxa, is located on the traditional lands of the Narragansett Nation and the Niantic People, and is utilized by a range of individuals spanning University and local communities, all with different interests and priorities. This precludes a “single-author vision” for the woods, and instead indicates the need for continuing co-creation through community-engaged work (Costanza-Chock 2020).
As demonstrated through our various case studies, our work with the North Woods provides visitors an opportunity to re-imagine and re-determine their relationship with the campus woods. By not only permitting but also encouraging creative participation, the North Woods Project contributes to deep mapping practices that promote a richer understanding of place. Combining digital field methods with deep mapping and emerging technologies requires designers to slow down and spend time “bodystorming” in place, fostering relationships between people and place, and being open to wayfaring with the people and places that share in guiding the direction of the work. Additionally, by working in and with the natural environment, we create tangible and meaningful connections between our creative work and the natural world. For example, during our art printing workshop, we directly incorporated and improvised the forms, colors, and textures we encountered in the North Woods into our image-making processes. Likewise, leading a workshop about field notes in the North Woods invited our participants to foster an individual and collective sense of place. Participants kept their own field notes, and they had the opportunity to draw on them in the art and poetry workshops, further driving personal connections between the observational science of natural history and the observational traditions of art and creative forms. Through understanding traditions from art, writing, ecology, and ethnography–in combination with digital and physical note taking– our work weaves the narratives of people, places, and moments in time.
Our experiences with this phase of interventions around NWP have provided us with the following insights:
The weekend began with a field notes workshop and culminated with a group regna writng, ultimately synthesizing objective observations with subjective experiences. We met at a crossroads of arts and science to explore how we might foster inclusive and reciprocal relationships in the North Woods, and additionally promote “choose-your-own-adventure” experiences of learning often not possible in the traditional classroom setting.
Emphasizing participatory engagement in our work, we strive to create an inclusive environment where dialogue and contextual understanding are encouraged among diverse participants. Building from such participatory rhetoric and field methods, our work with the North Woods involves a collaborative process of meaning-making in which individuals and places shape one another. Through this project, we investigate the ways in which various field methods (ecology, fiber arts, visual arts, poetry, and audio/visual media) deepen relationships and increase access to our campus forest, the North Woods. As opposed to traditional academic assignments, there are no “wrong” ways to engage these field methods. Instead, exploratory, experience-based community engagement enables students to shape their own learning. For example, encouraging out-of-classroom and informal learning experiences can help foster curiosity, excitement, and new perspectives about the North Woods. Curating multimodal experiences in the North Woods via fiber art, video, printmaking, mapping, storytelling, and field notes exemplifies the rich and layered perspectives of North Woods visitors. Our collaborative and exploratory approach to this work allows for the North Woods and its role on our university campus to evolve over time.
This project has explored how interdisciplinary field methods—from ecology and fiber arts to visual arts, poetry, and audio/visual media—can foster deeper relationships with the North Woods and broaden access to this unique campus environment. Unlike traditional academic assignments with rigid structures, these approaches encourage exploratory, experience-based engagement, allowing students and community members to shape their own learning paths. The multimodal experiences documented here demonstrate how place-based engagement can support a diverse array of perspectives and forms of knowledge. As university property, the future of the North Woods remains uncertain; we hope that this project underscores the forest’s invaluable role on campus and advocates for its preservation as a vital space for learning, creativity, and ecological advocacy.
Home | Top of Section
Madison Jones:[1][2][3] Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing (Drafting, Editing, and Revising), Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition; Ally Overbay:[2][3] Investigation, Writing (Drafting, Editing, and Revising), Visualization; Joseph Ahart:[2][3] Investigation, Writing (Drafting); AnnaFaith Jorgensen:[2][3] Investigation, Writing (Drafting, Editing, and Revising), Visualization; Ashley Katusa:[2][3] Investigation, Writing (Drafting, Editing, and Revising), Visualization; Erin Edmonds:[4] Investigation, Writing (Drafting, Editing, and Revising), Visualization; and Travess Smalley:[5] Investigation, Writing (Drafting), Visualization, Funding acquisition.
[1]Department of Professional & Public Writing; [2]Department of Natural Resources Science; [3]Digital Writing Environments, Location, & Localization (DWELL) Lab; [4]Department of Art & Art History; [5]College of Pharmacy.
We thank the Kairos journal editors, special issue editors, reviewers, and poduction team for their generous feedback which helped refine and develop this project. Taûbotne anawáyean (thank you) to Lynsea Montanari and the Indigenous Empowerment Center at the Tomaquag Museum for their leadership and collaboration. Special thanks to the URI graduate students in BES 521: Rhetorical Field Methods for Science Communication and WRT 534/NRS 530: Visualizing Environmental Advocacy and in the DWELL Lab for their sustained contributions to this project and other ongoing related work.
Funding for the North Woods Project was provided by the North Woods Stewardship Council at the University of Rhode Island and a CAREERS Cyberteam NSF Grant (no: FL6GV84CKN57). The authors acknowledge use of the resources of the URI Center for Computational Research and the Massachusetts Green HPC Center for this work. Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this webtext do not necessarily represent those of our sponsors. This webtext was built by Madison Jones, adapting the Astral template by HTML5Up.net. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Background images courtesy of the authors. Landing page image from "Real-time 3D Lidar with Inertial and Lidar Odometry" courtesy of Heikki Hyyti.
Arola, Kristin. (2018). A Land-Based Digital Design Rhetoric. In The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric, Jonathan Alexander, Jacqueline Rhodes (eds.), Routledge.
Binley, Allison & Bennett, Joseph. (2023). The data double standard. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14110
Bost, Marcia I. (2010). Quilts as Visual Texts. Kennesaw State University Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 418.
Butts, Shannon & Jones, Madison. (2021). Deep mapping for environmental communication design. Communication Design Quarterly, 9(1) (March 2021), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3437000.3437001
Byrd, Don, and Owens, Derek. (1998). "Writing in the Hivemind." Taylor, T., and Ward, I. (Eds.) Literacy Theory in the Age of the Internet. Columbia UP.
Chevrette, Roberta, Hanchey, Jenna, Lechuga, Michael, Hess, Aaron, & Middleton, Michael, K. (2023). Rhetorical Field Methods/Rhetorical Ethnography. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved 14 May. 2024, from https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-1378.
Cramer, Florian. (2014). “What is ‘Post-digital’?” A Peer-Reviewed Journal About Post-Digital Research, Vol. 3, No. 1 Retrieved 14 May. 2024, from https://aprja.net//issue/view/8400.
Cizek, Katerina, Uricchio, William, Anderson, Juanita, Carter, Maria A., Detroit Narrative Agency, Harris, Thomas A., Holmes, Maori K., Lachman, Richard, Massiah, Louis, Mertes, Cara, Rafsky, Sara, Stephenson, Michèle, Winger-Bearskin, Amelia, & Wolozin, Sarah. (2022). Collective Wisdom: Co-Creating Media for Equity and Justice. The MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13394.001.0001
Eccles, Kathryn, Herman, Laura, Moruzzi, Caterina, & Mustaklem, Maggie. (2024). Introducing the Method of Exhibit-Based Research. Communication Design Quarterly, 12(1), https://cdq.sigdoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CDQ-12.1.pdf#page=48
Endres, Danielle. (2023). Nuclear Decolonization: Indigenous Resistance to High-level Nuclear Waste Siting. Ohio State UP.
Haiku Hike. (2024). Google My Maps https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1WO0HBJgUHan7WteMbM3FWl8kHOX9wJ0. Accessed 15 May 2024
Heilig, Leah, Jones, Madison, Overbay, Ally, & Roberts, Taylor. (2024). Augmenting for Accessible Environments: Layering Deep Mapping, Deep Accessibility, and Community Literacy. Communication Design Quarterly , 12(2), 33-43 https://cdq.sigdoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Communication-Design-Quarterly-12.2.pdf#page=33.
Jones, Madison. (2024). "Local." Tham, J. Keywords in Making: A Rhetorical PrimerParlor P.
Krall, Florence R. (1994). Ecotone: Wayfaring on the margins. State University of New York Press.
LaFollette, Kristin. (2022). Exploring Embodiment Through Rhetoric of Health and Medicine: An Arts-Based, Transgenre Pedagogy. Across the Disciplines, 19(3/4), 180-197, https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2022.19.3-4.02
Larsen, Soren C. & Johnson, Jay T. (2017). Being Together in Place: Indigenous Coexistence in a More Than Human World. University of Minnesota Press, https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt81r
Liboiron, Max. (2021). Pollution Is Colonialism. Duke UP, https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478021445
Markelj, Jernej & Sundvall, Scott. (2023). Theming electracy: An interview with Gregory L. Ulmer. Convergence, 29(1), 11-27, https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231155078
McGreavy, Bridie. (2024). Tides, Touch, and Care in Collaborative Fieldwork. Environmental Communication, 18(1–2), 126–131, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2296834
Milligan, Chloe. (2024). "Bodystorming." Tham, J. Keywords in Making: A Rhetorical PrimerParlor P.
Morey, Sean & Dobrin, Sidney (eds). (2009). Ecosee: Image, Rhetoric, Nature. State University of New York Press.
O’Brien, April. (2024). Shifting Method/ologies: My Journey with Countermapping. Holmes, A. J., & Hurley, E. V. (Eds.). Learning from the Mess: Method/ological Praxis in Rhetoric and Writing Studies , 125-145, The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado, https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2024.2180
O’Brien, April & Houston, Sam. (2020). “Mapping and/as Remembering: Chora/graphy as a Critical Spatial Method-Methodology.” Enculturation, 31, http://enculturation.net/mapping_as/and_remembering
Rand, Harry. (1991). Hundertwasser 85-88. Köln: Benedikt Taschen Verlag.
Rivers, Nathaniel A. (2016). Geocomposition in Public Rhetoric and Writing Pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 67(4), 576–606, https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201629614
Sivils, Matthew W. (2004). William Bartram's Travels and the Rhetoric of Ecological Communities. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment , 11(1), 57–70, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/11.1.57
Smith, Joshua. (2020). The Moving Boundaries of Bears Ears: Ecological Rhetorics and the Shrinking of a Monument. Rhetoric Society Quarterly , 50(5),352-367, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1813323
StoryWalk: Kellogg-Hubbard Library. K-H Library https://www.kellogghubbard.org/storywalk. Accessed 15 May 2024.
Tenzek, Kelly E. (2017). Field notes. In Mike Allen (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 564–566), https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411
Tempest Williams, Terry. (2008). Finding beauty in a broken world. Vintage Books.
Ulmer, Gregory L. (2023). Miami Virtue: Choragraphy of the Virtual City. Brill.
—. (1985). Applied Grammatology: Post(e)-pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys. Johns Hopkins UP.
—. (1983).“The Object of Post-Criticism.” In Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture Hal Foster (ed.), 83-110, Bay Press.
Weaver, Ian. (2022). Participatory Design. In Tham, Jason C. K. (Ed.). Keywords in Design Thinking: A Lexical Primer for Technical Communicators & Designers, The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/TPC-B.2022.1725
Home | Top of Section